Skip to main content

Table 2 Number of DEGs selected from each comparison of treated IPECJ2 cells versus control cells and used for functional analysis

From: Transcriptional response of cultured porcine intestinal epithelial cells to micro algae extracts in the presence and absence of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli

Microarray comparison$

(algae extract vs. control)

2 h (FC&)

6 h (FC&)

E

130 (> 2)

75 (> 3)

C

107 (> 2)

47 (> 3)

C-E

232 (> 3*)

114 (> 3*)

H

30 (> 2)

96 (> 2)

H-E

409 (> 3*)

100 (> 3*)

S

272 (> 2)

91 (> 2)

S-E

14 (> 3*)

37 (> 3*)

AM

ND

727 (> 3)

AM-E

ND

292 (> 3*)

  1. $microarray data of treatments were compared to microarray data recorded from control cells (not challenged with ETEC or with algae extracts) that were harvested at the same time point. E = ETEC
  2. &FC = fold change cut-off for selection of significantly (p < 0.05) differential expressed genes (ratio treatment over control cells)
  3. *DEGs were included in lists for functional analysis in case the measured FC for the comparison of a mixture (algae extract plus ETEC) versus control cells was at least 3-fold higher or lower than measured in the comparison of “ETEC versus control cells” (E) at the same time point
Back to article page

Genes & Nutrition

ISSN: 1865-3499

Contact us