Skip to main content

Table 1 Anthropometric characteristics, fasting and postprandial values of all subjects at the end of each intervention period

From: Influence of different CLA isomers on insulin resistance and adipocytokines in pre-diabetic, middle-aged men with PPARγ2 Pro12Ala polymorphism

All subjects (n = 35)

Preparation

Linoleic acid from safflower oil

Tonalin® (50:50 mix)

Cis-9, trans-11 CLA

Trans-10, cis-12 CLA

p-Value within group

Anthropometry

Weight

84.2 (±2.0)

84.2 (±2.0)

84.1 (±2.0)

84.0 (±2.0)

0.851

BMI (kg/m2)

26.1 (±0.5)

26.1 (±0.4)

26.0 (±0.4)

26.0 (±0.5)

0.900

Waist (cm)

102.1 (±1.5)

102.1 (±1.6)

102.3 (±1.5)

101.3 (±1.5)

0.172

Hip (cm)

104.8 (±1.0)

104.8 (±1.0)

104.8 (±1.0)

104.0 (±1.0)

0.824

Waist/hip ratio

0.97 (±0.01)

0.97 (±0.01)

0.98 (±0.01)

0.97 (±0.01)

0.645

Fasting values

Plasma glucose (mg/dl)

96.5 (±1.4)

98.2 (±1.5)

97.5 (±1.5)

96.5 (±1.4)

0.487

Serum insulin (μU/ml)

12.5 (±1.0)

12.9 (±1.0)

12.5 (±1.1)

12.2 (±1.0)

0.898

HOMA-IR (μU/ml*mg/dl/405

3.0 (±0.3)

3.2 (±0.2)

3.1 (±0.3)

2.9 (±0.3)

0.828

Triacylglycerols (mg/dl)

127.0 (±10.1)

124.4 (±10.8)

119.1 (±8.9)

124.7 (±10.6)

0.787

Adiponectin (ng/ml)

7,334 (±467)

7,452 (±497)

7,681 (±493)

7,172 (±479)

0.152

Plasma leptin (pg/ml)

5,054 (±532)a

4,732 (±482)a,b

5,027 (±559)a

4,425 (±528)b

0.054

Postprandial values

Glucose AUC (mg/dl)

483.0 (±8.9)

484.5 (±8.3)

472.3 (±7.9)

447.6 (±23.4)

0.111

Insulin AUC (μU/ml)

155.6 (±11.3)b

137.5 (±10.2)a

143.6 (±10.8)a

157.2 (±13.0)b

0.054

HOMA-IR AUC

189.0 (±14.8)a,b

167.3 (±13.4)a

169.2 (±13.7)a

195.4 (±19.5)b

0.025*

Triacylglycerols (mg/dl)

1,661 (±130)

1,621 (±126)

1,536 (±111)

1,666 (±135)

0.445

Adiponectin 5 h (ng/ml)

7,364 (±471)

7,401 (±467)

7,540 (±484)

7,067 (±470)

0.161

Leptin AUC (pg/ml)

39,092 (±4,060)

38,220 (±3,934)

39,502 (±4,386)

36,467 (±4,523)

0.320

  1. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM
  2. CLA conjugated linoleic acid, BMI body mass index
  3. * Significant differences between intervention periods in overall test (p ≤ 0.05; MANOVA). Duncan′s post hoc test was used to describe where the differences between intervention groups appeared. Means that are significantly different from others are marked as unlike letters. p-Value ≤ 0.1 was seen as a trend. To demonstrate where differences occurred in analyses, means were marked as unlike letters, too. For details of diets, see research design and methods