From: Genetic and environmental influences on nutrient intake
Author | Sample | Age | Method | Gender | Energy intake | Macronutrient intake | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carbohydrate | Fat | Protein | ||||||||||||||
A | C(D) | E | A | C(D) | E | A | C(D) | E | A | C(D) | E | |||||
Hasselbalch et al. (2008) | n = 1,212 Denmark | 18–67 \( \bar{x} \) = 38 | FFQ | Males | 0.38 | – | 0.62 | 0.36a | – | 0.64 | 0.01 ns | (0.36) | 0.63 | 0.28a | – | 0.72 |
Females | 0.32 | – | 0.68 | 0.49a | – | 0.51 | 0.01 ns | (0.43) | 0.56 | 0.01 ns | (0.55a) | 0.44 | ||||
Hur et al. (1998) | n = 335 USA/UK | 18–77 \( \bar{x} \) = 42.4 | FFQ | Male + female | 0.32 | – | 0.68 | 0.25 | – | 0.75 | 0.35 | – | 0.65 | 0.16 ns | – | 0.84 |
0.24 ns SC | – | 0.76 | 0.37 Sat | – | 0.63 | |||||||||||
0.18 ns CC | – | 0.82 | 0.46 Poly | – | 0.54 | |||||||||||
Wade et al. (1981)d | n = 46 Canada | 19–58 \( \bar{x} \) = 39.2 | 3-day food diary | Female | 0.11 ns | 0.66 | –b | 0.20 | ||||||||
0.67a | 0.48a | 0.70a | ||||||||||||||
Heller et al. (1988)d | n = 400 Australia | 17–66 \( \bar{x} \) = 36 | 4-day food diary | Male + female | 0.38 ns (0.27) | 0.31 ns (0.36) | 0.24 ns (0.16) | 0.08 ns (−0.13) | ||||||||
0.20 SC | 0.10 SF | |||||||||||||||
0.55 CC | 0.33 MF | |||||||||||||||
0.03 PF | ||||||||||||||||
de Castro et al. (1993) | n = 390 USA | \( \bar{x} \) = 38.8 | 7-day food diary | Male + female | 0.65 | – | 0.35 | 0.61 | – | 0.39 | 0.57 | – | 0.43 | 0.50 | – | 0.50 |
Faith et al. (1999) | n = 108 USA | >18 | 2 buffet lunches in lab session | Male + female | 0.33 | 0.48c ns | 0.19c |