Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of genotype and allele frequencies of MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, SLC19A1 G80A, SLC19A1 C696T, MTRR A66G polymorphisms between REPL patients and control subjects stratified by folic acid supplementation status

From: The association of idiopathic recurrent early pregnancy loss with polymorphisms in folic acid metabolism-related genes

Genotype and allele

Folic acid supplementation

Yes

No

Control (n = 74)

Case (n = 54)

AOR (95 % CI)

P value

Control (n = 92)

Case (n = 28)

AOR (95 % CI)

P value

MTHFR C677T

 CC

20 (0.270)

29 (0.354)

1.00 (ref)

–

33 (0.359)

12 (0.429)

1.00 (ref)

–

 CT

40 (0.541)

31 (0.574)

0.90 (0.37–2.11)

0.812

43 (0.467)

12 (0.439)

0.75 (0.30–1.89)

0.540

 TT

14 (0.189)

6 (0.111)

0.42 (0.12–1.42)

0.162

16 (0.174)

4 (0.142)

0.67 (0.18–2.41)

0.535

 CT+TT

  

0.77 (0.34–1.74)

0.525

  

0.73 (0.31–1.73)

0.469

 C

80 (0.541)

65 (0.602)

1.00 (ref)

–

109 (0.592)

36 (0.643)

1.00 (ref)

–

 T

68 (0.459)

43 (0.398)

0.73 (0.43–1.24)

0.238

75 (0.408)

20 (0.357)

0.79 (0.43–1.48)

0.466

MTHFR A1298C

 AA

62 (0.838)

31 (0.574)

1.00 (ref)

–

70 (0.761)

18 (0.643)

1.00 (ref)

–

 AC

12 (0.162)

22 (0.407)

3.08 (1.30–7.32)

0.011#

19 (0.207)

9 (0.321)

1.88 (0.72–4.86)

0.196

 CC

0 (0.000)

1 (0.019)

$

$

3 (0.032)

1 (0.036)

1.38 (0.13–14.13)

0.788

 AC+CC

  

3.26 (1.38–7.70)

0.007

  

1.81 (0.73–4.52)

0.204

 A

136 (0.919)

84 (0.778)

1.00 (ref)

–

159 (0.864)

45 (0.804)

1.00 (ref)

–

 C

12 (0.081)

24 (0.222)

2.87 (1.31–6.26)

0.008

25 (0.136)

11 (0.196)

1.59 (0.73–3.50)

0.246

SLC19A1 G80A

 GG

23 (0.311)

16 (0.296)

1.00 (ref)

–

22 (0.239)

6 (0.214)

1.00 (ref)

–

 GA

41 (0.554)

24 (0.444)

1.15 (0.48–2.78)

0.755

53 (0.576)

13 (0.464)

0.88 (0.29–2.61)

0.813

 AA

10 (0.135)

14 (0.259)

2.74 (0.92–8.18)

0.071

17 (0.185)

9 (0.322)

1.87 (0.55–6.33)

0.313

 GA+AA

  

1.48 (0.65–3.41)

0.353

  

1.12 (0.40–3.12)

0.833

 G

87 (0.588)

56 (0.519)

1.00 (ref)

–

97 (0.527)

25 (0.446)

1.00 (ref)

–

 A

61 (0.412)

52 (0.481)

1.60 (0.94–2.74)

0.086

87 (0.473)

31 (0.554)

1.36 (0.74–2.48)

0.319

SLC19A1 C696T

 CC

23 (0.311)

17 (0.315)

1.00 (ref)

–

22 (0.239)

6 (0.214)

1.00 (ref)

–

 CT

40 (0.541)

23 (0.426)

1.03 (0.43–2.45)

0.955

54 (0.587)

12 (0.429)

0.79 (0.26–2.37)

0.670

 TT

11 (0.148)

14 (0.259)

2.24 (0.77–6.48)

0.138

16 (0.174)

10 (0.357)

2.24 (0.67–7.46)

0.190

 CT+TT

  

1.31 (0.58–2.95)

0.523

  

1.12 (0.40–3.12)

0.833

 C

86 (0.581)

57 (0.528)

1.00 (ref)

–

98 (0.533)

24 (0.429)

1.00 (ref)

–

 T

62 (0.419)

51 (0.472)

1.47 (0.86–2.50)

0.161

86 (0.467)

32 (0.571)

1.50 (0.82–2.75)

0.187

MTRR A66G

 AA

41 (0.554)

43 (0.524)

1.00 (ref)

–

57 (0.620)

16 (0.571)

1.00 (ref)

–

 AG

23 (0.301)

28 (0.341)

1.19 (0.52–2.74)

0.686

30 (0.326)

10 (0.357)

1.14 (0.45–2.84)

0.785

 GG

10 (0.135)

11 (0.134)

1.82 (0.61–5.44)

0.283

5 (0.054)

2 (0.072)

1.27 (0.22–7.43)

0.787

 AG+GG

  

1.36 (0.64–2.87)

0.423

  

1.16 (0.48–2.77)

0.746

 A

105 (0.710)

72 (0.667)

1.00 (ref)

–

144 (0.783)

42 (0.750)

1.00 (ref)

–

 G

43 (0.290)

36 (0.333)

1.40 (0.79–2.48)

0.248

40 (0.217)

14 (0.250)

1.14 (0.56–2.31)

0.724

  1. $ mens it cannot be calculated duo to the 0 in the cells
  2. #Significance level α = 0.0167 by Bonferroni correction