Table 4 Preferences for genetic-based personalized nutrition by psychological characteristics
From: Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary
Total, % | Particularly attractive, % | Both attractive and not attractive, % | Not attractive at all, % | χ2 | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived risk | ||||||
Agree | 46.5 | 13.8 (− 6.8) | 41.4 (-2.3) | 44.8 (8.9) | 93.018*** | 903 |
Disagree | 53.5 | 33.3 (6.8) | 49.1 (2.3) | 17.6 (− 8.9) | ||
Perceived uncertainty | ||||||
Agree | 78.8 | 21.4 (− 2.8) | 46.2 (0.0) | 32.4 (2.5) | 10.279** | 955 |
Disagree | 21.2 | 30.7 (2.8) | 46.0 (0.0) | 23.3 (-2.5) | ||
Subjective norms | ||||||
Agree | 45.0 | 37.3 (8.0) | 42.5 (− 0.8) | 20.2 (− 6.5) | 78.162*** | 815 |
Disagree | 55.0 | 13.2 (8.0) | 45.3 (0.8) | 41.5 (6.5) | ||
Perceived costs/benefits | ||||||
Agree | 55.8 | 34.9 (7.9) | 48.9 (2.8) | 16.2 (− 10.5) | 127.687*** | 905 |
Disagree | 44.2 | 12.0 (− 7.9) | 39.5 (− 2.8) | 48.5 (10.5) | ||
Perceived behavioural control | ||||||
Agree | 63.4 | 29.9 (5.2) | 44.3 (− 0.2) | 25.7 (− 4.6) | 35.234*** | 907 |
Disagree | 36.6 | 14.5 (− 5.2) | 45.2 (0.2) | 40.4 (4.6) | ||